- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:02:32 +0100
- To: "Steve K Speicher" <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org, "Vincent Hardy" <Vincent.Hardy@sun.com>
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:57:18 +0100, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>>> I see. The Window Object 1.0 specification already mandates that >>>> though (section 2.2 in the current draft). So it seems unnecessary. > > Though I'd hesitate to assume that Window Object already mandates it, as > it has only gone through 1 public work draft and not last call. So I'd > recommend getting an official response from the WebAPI WG stating that > this WILL remain before pulling it from our spec. ?? As I pointed out it already does. In section 2.2 of the current Window Object 1.0 draft... >>> If we take out section 3.6.10 from WICD Mobile (the one you are >>> commenting on), there are no other references to the Window Object 1.0 >>> specification. >> >> Suggested wording: >> >> A conformanet WICD Mobile 1.0 user agent must support >> the Window Object 1.0 specification. [Window] > > This is already said, indirectly, since CDRF requires Window in: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CDR-20061122/#dom > > Perhaps this conformance statement should be added to CDRF conformance > section. I thought Window was already required somewhere else but apparently dropping section 3.6.10 was found to be objectionary. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 2 February 2007 20:03:10 UTC