- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:37:45 +0100
- To: "Vincent Hardy" <Vincent.Hardy@sun.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:58:47 +0100, Vincent Hardy <Vincent.Hardy@Sun.COM> wrote: > What we are saying is: > > "In conformant WICD Mobile 1.0 user agents, the org.w3c.dom.AbstractView > associated with an org.w3c.dom.DocumentView (I.E THE defaultView > property) must be an implementation of the Window interface as defined > in the Window Object 1.0specification." > > Which means that the defaultView instance has to be a Window object (as > opposed to be another implementation of AbstractView that does not > implement the Window interface). Yes, the Window interface is defined to > extend AbstractView, but that is not enough to specify that the > defaultView property be a Window implementation. I see. The Window Object 1.0 specification already mandates that though (section 2.2 in the current draft). So it seems unnecessary. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 2 February 2007 14:38:18 UTC