- From: Kevin E Kelly <kekelly@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:08:15 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF0B1CCFB5.38B30888-ON85257134.003EE74F-85257134.0042654A@us.ibm.com>
Maceij,
Your email was reviewed and discussed by the WG at a recent Face-to-face
meeting. Comments and responses are marked below with [CDF].
If this does not satisfy your comment/concern please respond within 2
weeks.
Regards,
Kevin
On behalf of the CDF WG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2006Jan/0019.html
F2F discussion http://www.w3.org/2006/01/30-cdf-irc
Action http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/track/actions/368
Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Sent by: public-cdf-request@w3.org
01/02/2006 05:14 AM
To
public-cdf@w3.org
cc
Subject
CDR: who is the audience?
Who is the intended audience for this specification?
Is it meant to be an actual specification that user agents should
implement and that content authors should write to?
[CDF] Yes.
Or is it meant to
be just a meta-spec that defines requirements that other specs should
follow?
[CDF] The Profiles build on the Framework and profile Core document.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#cd-framework (last paragraph)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#related-documents
http://www.w3.org/TR/WICD/#scope (first paragraph)
http://www.w3.org/TR/WICD/#related (document descriptions and
relationships for WICD)
[CDF] It seems as if we have spread the total answer to your question
across the Framework and WICD Core documents.
[CDF] Authoring Guidelines are in an Appendix to the documents,
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#authoring-guidelines
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20051219/#authoring-guidelines
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICDMobile-20051219/#authoring-guidelines
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICDFull-20051219/#authoring-guidelines
[CDF] No changes are being made in response to this comment.
I think it would be a sensible goal to define a baseline for cross-
document inclusion and behavior that works regardless of "profile" or
specific combination of languages being used. But currently, the spec
as written appears to entirely lack testable, meaningful conformance
criteria for either documents or user agents. I can't imagine how
anyone could write a CDR validator for content or a CDR test suite
for user agents. I do not see how one could check for the existence
of interoperable implementations.
[CDF] The first set of documents are for compound documents by reference
only, so there is no compound document by inclusion content yet other than
some definitions and non-normative examples in the Framework document.
Work has begun on the CDI documents.
[CDF] No changes are being made in response to this comment.
[CDF] There are testable assertions in the CDRF and WICD Core and
Profiles, and the CDF WG is building a test suite to test these
assertions.
[CDF] The Framework document does not have many testable assertions, but
that is becasue it is a framework document. One such testable assertions
is:
[assert-dom1: Compound Document profiles which leverage the
Compound Document
Framework and which support scripting must have scripting
interfaces that are compatible with the DOM Level 3 Core
Specification.]
[CDF] The WIDC Core and Profile documents have many more testable
assertions:
[assert-root-doc1: Any profile, conforming to WICD Core 1.0,
must support XHTML as root document.]
[assert-referencing-object: Any profile, comforming to WICD Core
1.0,
must support the <object> element as means to reference child
documents.]
[assert-svg-child-object-multiple: Multiple SVG child documents
may be referenced from the same XHTML document.]
[assert-svg-child-object-animating: Multiple SVG child documents
may animate in parallel.]
[assert-scalable-usecases: Any Scalable Child Element must
support these three use cases.]
[assert-scalable-icon1: Scalable Foreground Child Elements are
referenced using the XHTML
<object> element. They appear on the main XHTML layer, just
like bitmap images.]
[assert-scalable-icon2: User agents must support Scalable
Foreground Child Elements,
which may be animating, interactive and may have embedded
links.]
[CDF] No changes are being made in response to this comment.
The spec should either be reworked to have useful conformance
criteria, or it should clearly state that its target audience is
other specs, and remove the conformance criteria for user agents and
documents.
[CDF] The abstract texts for the Framework, WIDC Core, and Profiles state
the intent of the documents with additional explanatory text in the
related documents and scope sections. The intended audience is both user
agent developers and content authors. A separate Appendix on
Authoring Guidelines is in each document. No changes are being made in
response to this comment.
[CDF] The Conformance Appendixes in the document will remain. No changes
are being made in response to this comment.
Regards,
Maciej
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 12:05:45 UTC