- From: Kevin E Kelly <kekelly@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:08:15 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF0B1CCFB5.38B30888-ON85257134.003EE74F-85257134.0042654A@us.ibm.com>
Maceij, Your email was reviewed and discussed by the WG at a recent Face-to-face meeting. Comments and responses are marked below with [CDF]. If this does not satisfy your comment/concern please respond within 2 weeks. Regards, Kevin On behalf of the CDF WG Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2006Jan/0019.html F2F discussion http://www.w3.org/2006/01/30-cdf-irc Action http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/track/actions/368 Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> Sent by: public-cdf-request@w3.org 01/02/2006 05:14 AM To public-cdf@w3.org cc Subject CDR: who is the audience? Who is the intended audience for this specification? Is it meant to be an actual specification that user agents should implement and that content authors should write to? [CDF] Yes. Or is it meant to be just a meta-spec that defines requirements that other specs should follow? [CDF] The Profiles build on the Framework and profile Core document. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#cd-framework (last paragraph) http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#related-documents http://www.w3.org/TR/WICD/#scope (first paragraph) http://www.w3.org/TR/WICD/#related (document descriptions and relationships for WICD) [CDF] It seems as if we have spread the total answer to your question across the Framework and WICD Core documents. [CDF] Authoring Guidelines are in an Appendix to the documents, http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#authoring-guidelines http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20051219/#authoring-guidelines http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICDMobile-20051219/#authoring-guidelines http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICDFull-20051219/#authoring-guidelines [CDF] No changes are being made in response to this comment. I think it would be a sensible goal to define a baseline for cross- document inclusion and behavior that works regardless of "profile" or specific combination of languages being used. But currently, the spec as written appears to entirely lack testable, meaningful conformance criteria for either documents or user agents. I can't imagine how anyone could write a CDR validator for content or a CDR test suite for user agents. I do not see how one could check for the existence of interoperable implementations. [CDF] The first set of documents are for compound documents by reference only, so there is no compound document by inclusion content yet other than some definitions and non-normative examples in the Framework document. Work has begun on the CDI documents. [CDF] No changes are being made in response to this comment. [CDF] There are testable assertions in the CDRF and WICD Core and Profiles, and the CDF WG is building a test suite to test these assertions. [CDF] The Framework document does not have many testable assertions, but that is becasue it is a framework document. One such testable assertions is: [assert-dom1: Compound Document profiles which leverage the Compound Document Framework and which support scripting must have scripting interfaces that are compatible with the DOM Level 3 Core Specification.] [CDF] The WIDC Core and Profile documents have many more testable assertions: [assert-root-doc1: Any profile, conforming to WICD Core 1.0, must support XHTML as root document.] [assert-referencing-object: Any profile, comforming to WICD Core 1.0, must support the <object> element as means to reference child documents.] [assert-svg-child-object-multiple: Multiple SVG child documents may be referenced from the same XHTML document.] [assert-svg-child-object-animating: Multiple SVG child documents may animate in parallel.] [assert-scalable-usecases: Any Scalable Child Element must support these three use cases.] [assert-scalable-icon1: Scalable Foreground Child Elements are referenced using the XHTML <object> element. They appear on the main XHTML layer, just like bitmap images.] [assert-scalable-icon2: User agents must support Scalable Foreground Child Elements, which may be animating, interactive and may have embedded links.] [CDF] No changes are being made in response to this comment. The spec should either be reworked to have useful conformance criteria, or it should clearly state that its target audience is other specs, and remove the conformance criteria for user agents and documents. [CDF] The abstract texts for the Framework, WIDC Core, and Profiles state the intent of the documents with additional explanatory text in the related documents and scope sections. The intended audience is both user agent developers and content authors. A separate Appendix on Authoring Guidelines is in each document. No changes are being made in response to this comment. [CDF] The Conformance Appendixes in the document will remain. No changes are being made in response to this comment. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 12:05:45 UTC