- From: Scott Hayman <shayman@rim.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:10:21 -0500
- To: <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-cdf@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hi, > From: fsasaki@w3.org > Comment 2 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Location in reviewed document: > > app. A [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#definitions] > > Comment: > > You write: \"For example: XML 1.1 or HTML documents tied > through hypertext reference producing as many DOM linked to > one another.\" What is the relation between versions of XML > and XML namespaces in this scenario? E.g what happens, if an > XML 1.0 document references an XML 1.1. document? It might be > that this depends on the languages being compounded, but you > should have general guidelines for (new) languages as well. There is no good reason why the version of XML was specified in the definition of CDR in the spec. We will update the spec to remove this. Please let the working group know within 2 weeks if this doesn't address your concern. Regards, Scott -- Scott Hayman mailto:shayman@rim.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 04:10:24 UTC