- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:52:52 -0500
- To: mark.sadecki@gmail.com
- Cc: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFB22DC070.498FB552-ON86257EA5.007D9A6A-86257EA5.007DAFBD@us.ibm.com>
Hi Mark, Please respond to below. I grabbed your old email address. Best, Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger ----- Forwarded by Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM on 08/18/2015 05:51 PM ----- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Mark Sadecki" <mark@w3.org> Cc: Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org> Date: 08/18/2015 04:38 PM Subject: RE: camvas accessibility test results They are in the email I sent to the list with the results of the testing but I have copied those results here. See test cases 4 and 5 (test harness timeouts) with links to the tests. I am totally slammed with other work right now, including a flight to Redmond which I am on now. :-) Mark, can you check the test harness code that Philippe worked on? Here are the tests rests I posted a while back with the test harness failures (time outs). 1. TODO addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is null, and a previous region has a null id https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#TODO_addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_not_null.2C_and_has_a_non-null_control.2C_and_a_previous_region_having_the_same_control_exists Passes Chrome Passes Firefox 2. TODO addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is null, and a previous region has a null id https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#TODO_addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_null.2C_and_a_previous_region_has_a_null_id Passes Chrome and Firefox Also shows incomplete mapping in accessibility API as it should because the associated button is outside the canvas element region. 3. TODO addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a previous region for the id is not null https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#TODO_addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_not_null.2C_with_a_non-null_region.2C_and_a_previous_region_for_the_id_is_not_null Passes in Chrome Firefox has a hit region on the first region that is not right but then again there are two regions having the same id and the second overrides the first. This is really an error condition as you have two hit regions having the same id so you would not be able to tell which object the hit test applied to if you had an event handler on canvas. I would consider this an author error although it is necessary that this be tested. Firefox has a width and height of the fallback button 4 pixels short of the 40 pixels. When the second, green rectangle (button 2), is drawn it also is 4 pixels short on the width and height and the first red rectangle (button 1). 4. addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a non-null control id where a previous non-null region, associated with this control, does exist in the hit region list but has a different id https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_not_null.2C_with_a_non-null_region.2C_and_a_non-null_control_id_where_a_previous_non-null_region.2C_associated_with_this_control.2C_does_exist_in_the_hit_region_list_but_has_a_different_id This passed both Chrome and Firefox in terms of the accessibilitiy API mappings and locations on the screen. For some reason the test harness indicated a timeout although I am not sure why 5. addHitRegion is called twice. The first call receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a non-null control. The control is associated with a fallback <div> having a WAI-ARIA role="button" and descendant text. The second call receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a non-null control. Both hit regions have distinctly different ids and controls. The control is associated with a fallback <a> having and descendant text. Each hit region is at distinctly different locations within the canvas. The path used to create each hit region is drawn on the canvas. Call removeHitRegion() for the ID of the first region. http://cptvitamin.github.io/wpt-canvas/2dcontext/hit-regions/removeHitRegion.TwoRegions-manual.html Chrome: - FAIL: the hit region start location of the red rectangle (top left is off) in the accessibility API. The hit regions should have been removed. It was not. - the hit region start location of the green rectangle (top left is off) in the accessibility API - The test file did not implement the mouse handler to print the id's of the hit when you mouse over the squares. Firefox: PASS except for the consistent 4 pixel errors in widths and heights. The test harness indicated a time out. I am not sure why. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org> Date: 08/13/2015 11:18 AM Subject: RE: camvas accessibility test results >Philip needs to fix one of his test cases wrt. what the author sees. His test case was timing out. Exactly which test? Given that Philippe is on vacation is there any other way to get this fixed/changed? Does this test not working block us from exiting CR? /paulc Sent from my Windows Phone From: Richard Schwerdtfeger Sent: 13/08/2015 11:53 AM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Canvas; HTML Accessibility Task Force Subject: RE: camvas accessibility test results done. I updated them yesterday. I am waiting on the fixes to happen. I see some notifications that Google is making fixes and addressing issues. Philip needs to fix one of his test cases wrt. what the author sees. His test case was timing out. Rich Schwerdtfeger Paul Cotton ---08/11/2015 02:29:51 PM---> Can you update the test results at https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test? Do you From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org> Date: 08/11/2015 02:29 PM Subject: RE: camvas accessibility test results > Can you update the test results at https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test? Do you have a schedule for updating the Canvas2D test results? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:19 AM To: Richard Schwerdtfeger Cc: Dominic Mazzoni; Rik Cabanier; Canvas; HTML Accessibility Task Force Subject: RE: camvas accessibility test results Thanks for the report and update. Do you think any of the reported failures should block our progress to Proposed Recommendation? Can you update the test results at https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 6:36 PM To: Canvas; HTML Accessibility Task Force Cc: Dominic Mazzoni; Rik Cabanier Subject: camvas accessibility test results I ran all the remaining canvas tests that indicated the test information needed to be filled in. There were a total of 5. Dominique you should take a look at test case 5. Let me know if you want me to open a bug with Chrome. Net, net: Chrome passes all cases except the ability to remove the hit region in test 5 below (I can still mouse over it and get an accessible from the point). This did not result in the first hit region being removed and the second hit region (bounds) were off in the accessibility API mapping. Rik, A general bug I found with Firefox is that the paths drawn for the rectangles are consistently 4 pixels short on both width and height and is then reflected in the hit region and accessibility API mappings. This bug is a general canvas problem as it impacts drawing and not just hit testing. There may be a transform error. The last two tests did not print out the results of the mouse overs to reflect the ids associated on a mouse "hit". The test cases are incomplete. I saw timeouts being generated. I tested with: Version 46.0.2473.0 canary (64-bit) Firefox 39 1. TODO addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is null, and a previous region has a null id https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#TODO_addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_not_null.2C_and_has_a_non-null_control.2C_and_a_previous_region_having_the_same_control_exists Passes Chrome Passes Firefox 2. TODO addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is null, and a previous region has a null id https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#TODO_addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_null.2C_and_a_previous_region_has_a_null_id Passes Chrome and Firefox Also shows incomplete mapping in accessibility API as it should because the associated button is outside the canvas element region. 3. TODO addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a previous region for the id is not null https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#TODO_addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_not_null.2C_with_a_non-null_region.2C_and_a_previous_region_for_the_id_is_not_null Passes in Chrome Firefox has a hit region on the first region that is not right but then again there are two regions having the same id and the second overrides the first. This is really an error condition as you have two hit regions having the same id so you would not be able to tell which object the hit test applied to if you had an event handler on canvas. I would consider this an author error although it is necessary that this be tested. Firefox has a width and height of the fallback button 4 pixels short of the 40 pixels. When the second, green rectangle (button 2), is drawn it also is 4 pixels short on the width and height and the first red rectangle (button 1). 4. addHitRegion receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a non-null control id where a previous non-null region, associated with this control, does exist in the hit region list but has a different id https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test#addHitRegion_receives_a_dictionary_object_whose_id_is_not_null.2C_with_a_non-null_region.2C_and_a_non-null_control_id_where_a_previous_non-null_region.2C_associated_with_this_control.2C_does_exist_in_the_hit_region_list_but_has_a_different_id This passed both Chrome and Firefox in terms of the accessibilitiy API mappings and locations on the screen. For some reason the test harness indicated a timeout although I am not sure why 5. addHitRegion is called twice. The first call receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a non-null control. The control is associated with a fallback <div> having a WAI-ARIA role="button" and descendant text. The second call receives a dictionary object whose id is not null, with a non-null region, and a non-null control. Both hit regions have distinctly different ids and controls. The control is associated with a fallback <a> having and descendant text. Each hit region is at distinctly different locations within the canvas. The path used to create each hit region is drawn on the canvas. Call removeHitRegion() for the ID of the first region. http://cptvitamin.github.io/wpt-canvas/2dcontext/hit-regions/removeHitRegion.TwoRegions-manual.html Chrome: - FAIL: the hit region start location of the red rectangle (top left is off) in the accessibility API. The hit regions should have been removed. It was not. - the hit region start location of the green rectangle (top left is off) in the accessibility API - The test file did not implement the mouse handler to print the id's of the hit when you mouse over the squares. Firefox: PASS except for the consistent 4 pixel errors in widths and heights. The test harness indicated a time out. I am not sure why. Rich Schwerdtfeger
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2015 22:53:25 UTC