W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Accessibility, perfect or better Re: hit testing and retained graphics

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:36:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4E15D287.3090406@w3.org>
To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
CC: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, "E.J. Zufelt" <everett@zufelt.ca>, Paul Bakaus <pbakaus@zynga.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, "david.bolter@gmail.com" <david.bolter@gmail.com>, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, "Mike@w3.org" <Mike@w3.org>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi, Charles-

Charles Pritchard wrote (on 7/1/11 2:08 PM):
> I'm with Doug's statement on his proposal: it's a false dichotomy.

Please don't quote me out of context.  It seems to me that you are using 
my words to support your proposal, which I don't support, or some other 
position, which I haven't taken a stand on.

I said specifically that forcing a choice between retained-mode (e.g. 
SVG) and immediate-mode (e.g. the Canvas 2D API) was a false dichotomy, 
since we have both available in the platform, and that making it easy 
for developers to use both together will promote (though not enforce) 
best practices.  My statement about "false dichotomy" was limited to 
that claim, and isn't a general statement of principle.

-Doug Schepers
W3C Staff Contact, SVG, WebApps, Web Events, and Audio WGs
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 15:37:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:10:32 UTC