Hi Paniz,
I am not quite following you. Could you please provide more detail?
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group
From: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: chuck@jumis.com, franko@microsoft.com, Mike@w3.org,
david.bolter@gmail.com, cyns@exchange.microsoft.com,
public-canvas-api@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Date: 07/07/2011 06:32 AM
Subject: Re: hit testing and retained graphics
Hello to all,
Maybe you think that this question is not related to this discussion,
But I want to know whether the web widget that are located on canvas,
are they incredible .I mean a check box with height 70,weight 70,
or no it will design as the common web widget on websites?
Thanks
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
Charles, Frank, Mike,
I am back from vacation. How far do we need to go with hit testing? Right
now I am looking at associating a closed draw path with a DOM object in
the canvas subtree. We would then need to address the routing of pointing
device input events to the DOM object. The drawing path can be used to
provide bound information to platform accessibility API.
Do we need to bind any other drawing properties to the canvas object -
similar to the way device context's are handled on graphic subsystems
like Windows?
Mike, I am including you as before I went on vacation you indicated that
a number of developers desired this feature and wanted to be involved.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group
--
Paniz Alipour
