W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > April to June 2011

RE: hit testing and retained graphics

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: "'Paul Bakaus'" <pbakaus@zynga.com>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Charles Pritchard'" <chuck@jumis.com>, "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, "'Richard Schwerdtfeger'" <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "'Cameron McCormack'" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "'Cynthia Shelly'" <cyns@microsoft.com>, <david.bolter@gmail.com>, "'Frank Olivier'" <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, <Mike@w3.org>, <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>, <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00d001cc366e$c717ccf0$554766d0$@edu>
Paul Bakaus wrote:
> there are very few production
> apps out there that could benefit largely from increased accessibility
> on the canvas object itself. 

In other words, you will happily ship a work product that does not meet
accessibility requirements? I just want to be 100% crystal clear here, as
this is how I am interpreting that statement.

After all, all animals are created equal, some are just more equal than

Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 15:11:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:10:30 UTC