- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:49:24 -0500
- To: public-canvas-api@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA9B44E5F.42CB5D4A-ON8625761E.00750D36-8625761F.004670EE@us.ibm.com>
I wanted to log this. Thanks Maciej. Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist ----- Forwarded by Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM on 08/26/2009 04:18 PM ----- Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 08/22/2009 10:52 PM To James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> cc Sue E McNamara/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, David Bolter <david.bolter@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> Subject Re: Follow Up Call - HTML Canvas Accessibility On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:05 PM, James Craig wrote: > Hi Sue, > > Before you schedule another meeting, could you put together an > agenda of the topics that will be discussed in the meeting? Today's > meeting ended with action items that may take some time to complete. > We have clearly set ideas of how canvas can be made accessible, and > individuals are now working on it. My concern is that a > teleconference is a very inefficient venue for spec brainstorming. > > Given the actions that came out of today's meeting, I'm not sure a > follow-up is needed until the actions are complete. > > Actions from today: > > 1. Doug Schepers agreed to take a stab at a prototype of an > accessible canvas demo that was "faked" via a shadow tree that is an > offscreen or otherwise hidden sibling (rather than a descendant) of > the canvas element. Making the shadow tree a sibling will allow a > demo to work today without the need for browser updates. Siblings of > canvas will receive normal focus and key events; descendants will > not. Rich and I agreed to verify and help with the ARIA portions of > his demo once he has something to show. While Doug works on the main prototype, I volunteer to make a demo of specifically a chart drawn using canvas, with accessibility provided by a table. I can commit to having it ready by Sept. 4, 2009. (The chart will be dynamically generated, so it will demonstrate whether dynamically generating a matching table is viable and sufficiently author-friendly.) > 2. After it's determined that the prototype has merit, the browser > vendors will need to agree on a formal or informal set of changes > that need to be made to support a canvas shadow tree. This may be > accompanied by a prototyped release, but no vendor has formally > agreed to that yet. Once Doug gets to a stopping point, we can > probably decide follow-up steps on the public-canvas-api@w3.org list. I believe prototyping in an open source browser engine (Gecko or WebKit) would be a good way to validate the implementation side, but I don't think it needs to block a full proposal. > I think follow-up on the list is a good idea so other interested > parties aren't left out. I've added Maciej and Charles to the CC, > since both of them are involved in this discussion and were left off > the list. Agreed. I'm going to subscribe to public-canvas-api, and let's have further discussion there. Regards, Maciej > > Thanks, > James Craig > > > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 4:11 PM, David Singer wrote: > >> At 11:55 -0500 20/08/09, Sue E McNamara wrote: >>> Rich has asked me to schedule a follow up call on HTML Canvas >>> Accessibility >>> for next week. Following are the available times listed in CDT: >> >> I'm assuming this is a follow-up to today's call, or is there >> another purpose? These times are all way early for us on the left >> coast, and I know my colleagues who handle this are not early >> people... >> >>> >>> Tuesday, 8/25 >>> 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. CDT >>> >>> Wednesday, 8/26 >>> 10:00 - 11:00 a.m. CDT >>> >>> Thursday, 8/27 >>> 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. CDT >>> Friday, 8/28 >>> 10:00 - noon CDT >>> >
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 12:50:21 UTC