Re: [EXTERNAL] Interested in writing up an initial design for bidirectional WebDriver protocol

The PR title and the content don’t match…. This looks like a spec for bootstrap scripts. Which is excellent, and I’ll happily review if you’d like me to, but perhaps a little later? :)

Simon

> On 12 Mar 2020, at 22:18, Brandon Walderman <brwalder@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> I’ve created a PR in the w3c repo here: https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/pull/1487 <https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/pull/1487>
>  
> This is a direct copy of the explainer currently in the MS repo. I’m hoping we can merge it in as-is and then use further issues/PRs to iterate on it.
>  
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>  
> From: Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 2:13 AM
> To: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
> Cc: Brandon Walderman <brwalder@microsoft.com>; Simon Stewart <simon_stewart@apple.com>; John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>; public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Interested in writing up an initial design for bidirectional WebDriver protocol
>  
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 21:36, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk <mailto:james@hoppipolla.co.uk>> wrote:
> On 11/03/2020 21:12, Brandon Walderman wrote:
> 
> > I'm also happy with moving this to the webdriver repo under a directory. I can remove the original document from MSEdgeExplainers and have it redirect to the new home. As for mixing feedback from the existing spec and this, I'm personally not too concerned. We could always tag the feedback meant for the bidi document.
> > 
> 
> Great, sounds like we have a plan.
>  
> Hurrah! Thank you for taking this on, Brandon!
>  
> I guess this means I should be on the IRC channel too :)
>  
> Simon