RE: Implicit Wait Poll - please complete

The interactable part makes sense but I thought the original issue between the current implementation of the spec and what’s in the wild is having implicit wait also apply to SendKeys and Click, is that what was meant by interactable (I read these as two different things).

From: Simon Stewart [mailto:simon.m.stewart@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:36 AM
To: Clay Martin <clmartin@microsoft.com>
Cc: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>; public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
Subject: Re: Implicit Wait Poll - please complete

Hi,

Following up on this poll, the results were in favour of keeping implicit waits in webdriver, and that implicit waits should also be used to wait for an element to be interactable. I'm going to the relevant issue<https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/issues/438> on GH and work on some text for the spec.

Cheers,

Simon

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Clay Martin <clmartin@microsoft.com<mailto:clmartin@microsoft.com>> wrote:
What was the outcome of this poll?

From: David Burns [mailto:dburns@mozilla.com<mailto:dburns@mozilla.com>]
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 2:50 AM
To: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org<mailto:public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Implicit Wait Poll - please complete

I have extended the poll until next Friday as the amount of replies has been low.
Please can you make sure that you complete the poll.

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49799/implicit_waits/

David

On 31 October 2016 at 15:12, David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com<mailto:dburns@mozilla.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Following the thread of whether we should keep implicit waits, I have created a poll for you all to reply on. The poll will close on Friday (4 November) at midnight Eastern.

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49799/implicit_waits/

Thanks,
David