- From: Sam Uong <samuong@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 17:19:05 +0000
- To: Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>, Dave Hunt <dhunt@mozilla.com>
- Cc: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 17:41:36 UTC
Small correction here: ChromeDriver doesn't pass malformed URLs through the omnibox. Passing an invalid URL to the Get command results in an error. Relative URLs are also considered to be invalid. Browsing to about:blank and chrome://settings does work, although javascript: URLs won't. I don't think a full simulation of the omnibox/address bar belongs in WebDriver, and implementing it might cause confusion and interop issues (for certain inputs, some browsers would trigger a search while others would perform a navigation). I'd be fine with adding a new error status code for this, if others think it would be useful. Sam. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:21 AM Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2016, at 17:18, Dave Hunt wrote: > > Would the proposal still allow us to load about: pages in Firefox? As far > > as I can tell these aren’t valid URLs. > > I believe about:blank, about:preferences, et al. are considered “local > scheme” URLs (https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#local-scheme), and thus > valid. > >
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 17:41:36 UTC