- From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:09:49 +0100
- To: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
On 09/05/16 17:06, James Graham wrote:
> Summary of my thinking with the protocol at the moment (as much for my
> reference as anything):
>
> <ActionsCommand>
> {
> actions: [<ActionSequence>]
> }
>
> <ActionSequence>:
> {
> id: String, # Device id
> type: "key" | "pointer", # Type of actions in this sequence
> actions: [(<KeyAction>|<PointerAction>)|<GeneralAction>]
> }
I guess this is slightly wrong; it should be something like
[…]
actions: [<PointerActionItem>] | [KeyActionItem]
}
<KeyActionItem>:
<GeneralAction> | <KeyAction>
<PointerActionItem>:
<GeneralAction> | <PointerAction>
[…]
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 16:10:15 UTC