- From: Jason Leyba <jleyba@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:26:06 +0000
- To: Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>
- Cc: public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 17 November 2014 20:26:34 UTC
On Mon Nov 17 2014 at 12:17:54 PM Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jason Leyba <jleyba@google.com> wrote: > > Wouldn't this be covered by "unsupported operation"? > > I think that would fit well. Thanks for the quick reply! > > But just to clarify: We made the status codes strings so that the raw > wire protocol could more easily be read by humans, or so that it would > be possible to extend it? > IIRC it was to improve readability. To support extensions we probably just need a prefix scheme (e.g. "-moz failure") and graceful fallback to "unknown error".
Received on Monday, 17 November 2014 20:26:34 UTC