- From: Jason Leyba <jleyba@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:03:15 +0000
- To: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+ffpBxxJEpo+QruQsWEkCOgJFmJ6WJE1Gme6Xi0wFbhT92qtw@mail.gmail.com>
Inline. On Tue Nov 11 2014 at 3:52:59 PM David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com> wrote: > Answers inline > > On 10/11/2014 09:51, James Graham wrote: > > On 08/11/14 00:44, David Burns wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have started going through the notes and making some of the changes > >> and am looking at HTTP Response codes that should be returned. I have > >> put examples below, can you check that I am understanding correctly > >> before I carry on. This is only a subset but it covers most of the URL > >> endpoint types > >> > >> GET /session/{sessionId}/element/{ELEMENT}/attribute/{name} > >> 200 if the attribute found > >> 404 if not found with data being returned as {"value": null} > > I'm not sure why this would be {"value":null}; I thought the plan was > > for all non-200 responses to have {"error":something} in the body. > > I was trying to show that if we don't find the attribute/property name > we return a 404. The spec describes that if we can't find the > attribute/property we need to return a null. I am happy to have that > localends just infer that when they get back a 404 that it is the > equivalent to a null. > HTTP 404 implies an error. If we go this route (and I don't think we should), we should use a 204. > > > > > >> POST /session/{sessionId}/element/ > >> 200 if Element is found > >> 501 if it is not found with error in data model returned > > Assuming you mean this as an example of a method/path combo that doesn't > > exist, 404 seems more appropriate (and 405 if the path exists but the > > wrong method was used). > > Yea, we should be returning 405 if we expect a GET and get a POST or > <insert other verb here>. > What should we return if the URL and verb used are correct but the > element is not found? > > 200 with current status (kinda like what we do oyrselves > We shouldn't use HTTP codes for command results - we'll lose the ability to return errors about the request. Stick to convention on response codes: 5xx: server failed to process the request 4xx: invalid request (404 - session/element id not found, 405 method not permitted, etc.) 2xx: valid request & command executed successfully, see body for result > > > > >> POST /session/{sessionId}/element/{ELEMENT} > >> 200 if Element is found > >> 404 if it is not found with error in data model returned > > I don't see this in the spec, so it seems like it would return 404? > > I have a patch for this mostly done but would like to sort the data > modelling first because it will make reading it easier (at least in my > head) > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 00:04:29 UTC