- From: Sam Uong <samuong@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:22:12 +0000
- To: Jim Evans <james.h.evans.jr@gmail.com>, Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org" <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKhnsbFwT=hGt5vCe0d3T-2owW4=rf+tzhSPH3VkBcF=yzUjKg@mail.gmail.com>
Is the origin domain the same as "document.domain"? For both Chrome and Firefox (both of which support CSP) I get the domain of the page that I'm at when I run ExecuteScript("return document.domain;"). So it looks like both drivers execute scripts from self. I threw together a quick test case that uses the header below, and then executes a script from ChromeDriver, but I don't run into any problems with the script being blocked... Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; But even if drivers already side-step this issue by executing scripts under the right security origin, I agree that language needs to be added to the spec about this. Sam. On Mon Nov 03 2014 at 12:17:56 PM Jim Evans <james.h.evans.jr@gmail.com> wrote: > If I'm reading the CSP spec right, in the context of the current > recommendation, "self" merely matches the origin domain of the loaded page. > Injected script, such as that executed by executeScript, has no "source", > and thus does not match the "self" domain. I could be wrong, but I think it > might be blocked in this case. > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Jim Evans <james.h.evans.jr@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > If I'm reading things properly, a browser that implements the Content >> Security >> > Policy spec browsing a site that has a Content Security Policy can >> entirely >> > disable the execution of anonymous JavaScript. This would entirely >> break the >> > executeScript and executeAsyncScript commands[1]. >> >> I don't think it will since drivers usually operate with elevated >> security permissions, and always from localhost. As I understand it >> there's no way in CSP to disable execution of scripts from self? >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 07:46:39 UTC