- From: Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:19:54 +0100
- To: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
- Cc: public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:49 PM, David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com> wrote: > I have gone and created the wiki page[1] for next weeks meet. Please can you > make sure to add the items that you would like to discuss. I've added to the agenda that we need discuss the data model used in the specification. At our last meeting we reached consensus that Web IDL is not the right option for describing a wire protocol. In addition to defining the JSON schema (types, fields, input/output, encoding) we need to talk about unexpected behaviour and how to handle exceptions for ill-formed command payloads. This ties in with requests to illegal endpoints, which headers the remote should send, and so forth. I'm sure it's unnecessary to reiterate this point, but nailing down the data model is essential to continue ANY new feature work on the specification.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 15:20:22 UTC