Re: Proposal: Setting all capabilities to required from Andreas Tolfsen on 2014-10-19 (public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org from October to December 2014)

From: Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 01:03:46 +0100
To: Seva Lo <vlotoshnikov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAL_dnaW1=zx8fVj3N0T6k2c_FZioW1rB_RqrU3CTd5p3ruaBPw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Seva Lo <vlotoshnikov@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm following, Andreas. Yes, we don't know what additional
> capabilities the remote end may support. But how is that relevant in this
> discussion?

It's relevant towards how the spec is formulated.  Hence we can only
say that remote end must send back an explanation in the cases of the
required capabilities, and that they should return explanations for
any non-required capabilities.

Received on Sunday, 19 October 2014 00:04:14 UTC