W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: WebDriver TPAC Agenda Ideas

From: Marc Fisher <fisherii@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:09:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEqLoMg7zCACmfj4dEWJ-TB=SF1XhN_dHW0VBVOObmoutPv+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
Cc: public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
My primary interests are:

>
>    - Shadow DOM - Current spec API vs Future API
>
> This is creating very real problems for us as we move some projects to
AngularDart which heavily uses shadow DOM and web components.

>
>    - Define Interactable vs Visible semantics. In last F2F we briefly
>    discussed so would be good to solidify what this means.
>
> This comes up over and over again, so we really need to nail this down.

>From my POV the following doesn't need to be included in the current
version of the API, but others may feel different:

Handling of Accelerometer


Can you explain following?

>
>    - Window Management - in WebDriver takes a window handle ID as a
>    parameter but this is never passed. Should we keep this?
>
> Window handles are used in the window call (as one of several options, and
the documentation at
https://code.google.com/p/selenium/wiki/JsonWireProtocol#/session/:sessionId/window
doesn't
detail this) to switch to a window and are returned by the
window_handle/window_handles calls.


>    - Scroll to Element API
>
> Are you proposing a new API here? There isn't currently a scroll element
into view API directly available (at least that I see), just implicit
scrolling with a variety of commands.

Marc
Received on Monday, 4 November 2013 18:10:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:49 UTC