- From: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 19:49:59 +0100
- To: Ken Kania <kkania@google.com>
- CC: Marc Fisher <fisherii@google.com>, public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>, Zachary Conrad <zachconrad@google.com>, Vishal Arora <varora@google.com>
- Message-ID: <5228D257.40506@mozilla.com>
Ken, Can you write it and we can then discuss it in the bug since it will need a review? David On 05/09/2013 18:24, Ken Kania wrote: > ping Simon, Andreas > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ken Kania <kkania@google.com > <mailto:kkania@google.com>> wrote: > > I'd be happy to if others feel this might be a good approach. > Simon, Andreas, any reservations or thoughts? > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:03 AM, David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com > <mailto:dburns@mozilla.com>> wrote: > > Sorry for the late chime in. > > I would agree with Ken after looking at what our current > proposal[1] creates! Just hanging it off WebElement and then > searching from there with just a call to get all the shadow > roots which returns a list of WebElements and > element[<index>].find_element('<type>', '<identifier of node>'). > > Marc and Ken, do you want to take a bash at updating the spec > to contain what we have discussed here and uploading a patch > to the W3C Bug[2] ? > > David > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/selenium-developers/Dad2KZsXNKo > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/selenium-developers/Dad2KZsXNKo> > [2] > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22987 > > > On 20/08/2013 21:07, Ken Kania wrote: >> You understand correctly. I thought most stuff would work >> fine since I think we allow the Document to be treated as a >> WebElement, but there might be some stuff that needs to be >> fixed or perhaps throw an error for. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Marc Fisher >> <fisherii@google.com <mailto:fisherii@google.com>> wrote: >> >> >> They would be scoped based on the element id you give >> to search under >> >> >> So the command to get the shadow roots from a WebElement >> would return a list of WebElements? Shadow roots aren't >> actually HTML element objects, but I suppose from the POV >> of WebDriver that that doesn't actually matter very much. >> It does probably mean that most of the >> element/:elementId/... commands will fail if the >> :elementId corresponds to a shadow root (or they could be >> redirected to the owning HTML element I suppose). >> >> I would be fine with this suggestion, assuming I >> understand it correctly. >> >> Marc >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 18:50:28 UTC