W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Use of W3 Bugzilla on WebDriver Spec - Should we?

From: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:03:29 +0000
Message-ID: <510E7C41.2070905@mozilla.com>
To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com>, public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
I am happy to be the default assignee on this.

I will update the spec with the link for people to use if they want.

Thanks for doing this for us Mike!


On 02/02/2013 07:10, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> OK, I've now created the WebDriver component in the W3C bugzilla. So if you
> want, e.g., to include a "File a bug" link in the spec, you can use either
> of these:
>    https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=Browser%20Test%2FTools%20WG&component=WebDriver
>    http://w3.org/brief/MzE5
> Also let me know if you want to me to set one of you as the default
> assignee for bugs in that component.
> And for others in the group that want to "watch" this component: You can do
> that from https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email See the
> form at the bottom of that page, and add public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
> to your watch list there.
>    --Mike
> David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, 2013-02-01 13:39 +0000:
>> Make it so please Mike! I am assuming no other messages means that there are
>> no objections anyway.
>> Thanks for that!
>> David
>> On 01/02/2013 09:45, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
>>> Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com>, 2013-02-01 09:30 +0000:
>>>> Sounds like Bugzilla is the way forward, then. Do we want to vote, or
>>>> should we just Make It So?
>>> I don't think it needs a vote. It's an optional mechanism that people can
>>> use if they want and ignore if they want (and instead just e-mail their
>>> comments to the list).
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 15:03:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:48 UTC