W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Use of W3 Bugzilla on WebDriver Spec - Should we?

From: Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:30:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOrAhYFeyfxN6SfDtGS1mzor1NdUrvSEL_Cx68VzeO3_n1hO3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Cc: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:

> David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, 2013-01-28 11:28 +0000:
> > I have been wondering if we should start using the W3 Bugzilla to keep
> track
> > of outstanding tasks. At the moment a lot of the todos for the spec are
> > either written into the spec or on notes either Simon and I have or just
> in
> > our heads.
> I'm happy to set up a bugzilla product for the group and a component for
> the spec (and any other components we might want to add). We use the W3C
> bugzilla pretty productively with other groups -- and even for the WHATWG
> specs, outside of the W3C -- and implementors are all familiar with it
> already, so it's a fairly natural fit.

Sounds like Bugzilla is the way forward, then. Do we want to vote, or
should we just Make It So?

Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 09:30:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:48 UTC