Re: Use of W3 Bugzilla on WebDriver Spec - Should we? from Michael[tm] Smith on 2013-02-01 (public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org from January to March 2013)

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:27:42 +0900
To: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
Cc: public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130201072740.GQ73218@sideshowbarker>

David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, 2013-01-28 11:28 +0000:

> I have been wondering if we should start using the W3 Bugzilla to keep track
> of outstanding tasks. At the moment a lot of the todos for the spec are
> either written into the spec or on notes either Simon and I have or just in
> our heads.

I'm happy to set up a bugzilla product for the group and a component for
the spec (and any other components we might want to add). We use the W3C
bugzilla pretty productively with other groups -- and even for the WHATWG
specs, outside of the W3C -- and implementors are all familiar with it
already, so it's a fairly natural fit.

  --Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 07:27:51 UTC