Re: Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation

Thanks Jonathan. I suspect we'll find a few of these over the next few
months so I'll batch them up into the next iteration.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:59 AM, 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have found a minor editorial error:
>
>  In section 3.5.8, "(5.5.1 Thematic consistency) " is wrong section number.
>
>  Thematic Consistency part in MWBP, is section 5.1.1
>
> --- Jonathan Jeon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Francois Daoust
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:27 AM
> To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG
> Subject: Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate
> Recommendation
>
>
> Great news!
>
> The Mobile Web Application Best Practices has been published as a W3C
> Candidate Recommendation:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/mwabp/
>  (permanent link: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-mwabp-20100211/ )
>
> The Candidate Recommendation exit criteria are those agreed upon within
> the group:
>
> 1.  Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered
> to demonstrate that the Mobile Web Application Best Practices are
> implementable and are interpreted in a consistent manner. To test this,
> the Working Group expects to evaluate Web content (Web sites, pages)
> that has been created using the Mobile Web Application Best Practices.
> To exit "Candidate Recommendation" for each Best Practice, at least two
> Web sites/pages which are not solely demonstrations of Best Practices
> implementations should pass the Best Practice.
>
> 2. An implementation report has been produced indicating the results of
> using each best practice for the Web sites/pages considered
>
>
> The implementation report template should be used to provide
> implementation feedback:
>  http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template
>
> Please consider filling out one (or more!) implementation report(s)
> based on Web application(s) you may have developed. Thanks for passing
> the word out as well. The specification now cannot move forward without
> evidence that the Best Practices are implemented.
>
> Congratulations Adam, as editor!
> Congratulations to the Working Group, another step forward ;)
>
> Note that I wrote a short post on the BPWG blog to advertise the
> publication:
>
> http://www.w3.org/blog/BPWG/2010/02/11/mobile_web_application_best_practices_is
>
> Francois.
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 09:33:46 UTC