- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:07:59 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
If you'll forgive me crossing my boundaries here... Appendix E assumes that everyone understands what *.mobi means. I agree with Charles that other patterns are, de facto, associated with mobile. Without wishing to add to the burden, one could make this idea a little more extensible and less arbitrary with reference to [1]. This uses some EBNF written originally by the folk now working on the widgets specs, to define URI patterns. We use it in POWDER but we didn't write it. Something like 'following the method for defining URI patterns as given in POWDER Grouping of Resources, we note the following patterns...' Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-powder-grouping-20090901/#wild Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > There are a couple more patterns that are not currently mentioned in > appendix E: > > http://wap.* and http://m.* > > To be honest, I still hate the idea of using URI patterns in a > specification as general as this one. > > cheers > > Chaals > -- Phil Archer W3C Mobile Web Initiative http://www.w3.org/Mobile http://philarcher.org
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 08:08:39 UTC