- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:09:44 +0200
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
I had seen the change, it just did not occur to me that this meant I'd have to re-generate a new version of the ICS... Anyway. The new ICS doc is available at: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/ics-090923 I re-updated (in-place) the link to the ICS but now realize you are to generate a new version of the spec anyway. OK, time for coffee, it seems. Francois. Jo Rabin wrote: > Hey Francois > > What I forgot to mention was that a "should" has changed to a "must" in > the last revision so the conformance statement needs to be regenerated. > > What I also forgot to do as a result of what can only be described as > "extreme editorial sloppiness" is update section 3.4 in the spirit that > you have already mentioned, namely that the the first "must" in the > second paragraph should be emboldened, and the remaining RFC 2119 words > in that para should be in quotes (as they are references to rather than > uses of the terms). > > So if you would be so kind as to create a new ICS I will link to it and > do the update and create a brand new version 1v to celebrate. > > I think we are on the "long tail" of changes here. > > Jo > > On 24/09/2009 08:17, Francois Daoust wrote: >> Hi Jo, >> >> I took the liberty to do an in-place edit of the document as well to >> update the link to the ICS statement (which will anyway need to be >> updated when we publish the document for real as the editorial note >> suggests). >> >> Francois. >> >> >> Jo Rabin wrote: >>> Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an >>> in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below). >>> >>> Jo >>> >>> Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure. >>> >>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u >>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100 >>> From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> >>> To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly >>> released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012, >>> ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 >>> >>> >>> A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to >>> request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in >>> between. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Jo >>> >>> >>> >
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 08:10:20 UTC