W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:52:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4ABB2559.5060602@mtld.mobi>
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hey Francois

What I forgot to mention was that a "should" has changed to a "must" in 
the last revision so the conformance statement needs to be regenerated.

What I also forgot to do as a result of what can only be described as 
"extreme editorial sloppiness"  is update section 3.4 in the spirit that 
you have already mentioned, namely that the the first "must" in the 
second paragraph should be emboldened, and the remaining RFC 2119 words 
in that para should be in quotes (as they are references to rather than 
uses of the terms).

So if you would be so kind as to create a new ICS I will link to it and 
do the update and create a brand new version 1v to celebrate.

I think we are on the "long tail" of changes here.


On 24/09/2009 08:17, Francois Daoust wrote:
> Hi Jo,
> I took the liberty to do an in-place edit of the document as well to 
> update the link to the ICS statement (which will anyway need to be 
> updated when we publish the document for real as the editorial note 
> suggests).
> Francois.
> Jo Rabin wrote:
>> Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an 
>> in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below).
>> Jo
>> Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure.
>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u
>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100
>> From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
>> To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
>> Hi
>> I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly
>> released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012,
>> ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer.
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 
>> A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to
>> request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in
>> between.
>> Thanks
>> Jo
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 07:53:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:54 UTC