W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Reaching a final version of Addendum to BPWG

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:01:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4AB7B17E.1040200@mtld.mobi>
To: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
CC: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public MWBP <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi Kai


In answer to your question below:

 > Quoting from my message from the 7th:
 > "For example, I have normalized all bullet point lists that use
 > something like a sentence to using a period at the end and capital
 > letters in the beginning. We had a mix of Jo's ; and lower case
 > notation, . and lower case and the . and upper case notations. I prefer
 > the latter method."
 >
 > Do you see the inconsistency in the difference between bullets with a
 > couple of words and those with full sentences?
 > Please explain.  If it is the former, I will take editorial license and
 > leave it.
 > If there are truly inconsitencies, please point them out as I am, by
 > now, blind to them.

It's probably way easier if I just fix it up where I spot it. Can I edit 
the currently posted draft?

3.9, 3.10, 3.18, 3.19, 3.20 and 3.31

Sorry about this but I spotted another typo:

3.26 Style Sheets Size

Relevant Delivery Context Capabilities

Verify that style sheets do not contain more than 25% white space
Verify that all style rules are used somewhere in the Web site

The heading should be "Evaluation Procedure" I think.

Cheers
Jo



On 16/09/2009 16:19, Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich wrote:
> Hi Jo,
> 
> Thanks for your input.  Answers in the text.
> File will follow.
> 
> -- Kai
> 
> 
> 
>> I have only a couple of very minor observations.
>>
>> 1) the punctuation used to end bullets and numbered lists is 
>> not consistent (the predominant style seems to be to end with a ".")
> 
> Quoting from my message from the 7th:
> "For example, I have normalized all bullet point lists that use
> something like a sentence to using a period at the end and capital
> letters in the beginning. We had a mix of Jo's ; and lower case
> notation, . and lower case and the . and upper case notations. I prefer
> the latter method."
> 
> Do you see the inconsistency in the difference between bullets with a
> couple of words and those with full sentences?
> Please explain.  If it is the former, I will take editorial license and
> leave it.
> If there are truly inconsitencies, please point them out as I am, by
> now, blind to them.
> 
> 
> 
>> 2) Under "Evaluation" the formula "Verify that" is used 
>> pretty consistently up to about 3.8. After that it seems to 
> 
> <snip>
>  
>> I think the document would actually benefit from a small 
>> amount of tidying up in that area - maybe to use "verify 
>> that" throughout.
> 
> Good catch. 3.23 has been reformulated and the rest of the document has
> been adapted.
> 
> 
>> 3) the names of elements and attributes might benefit from 
>> <code> treatment.
> 
> Yes, I agree.  It has been done.
> Furthermore, all references to a specific elements have been placed in
> <> and code style
> 
> 
>> 4) Capitalization of some of the sub-heads e.g. Use of color 
>> => Use of Color, Examples of informal evaluation => Examples 
>> of Informal Evaluation
> 
> Done.  
> Examples of informal evaluation has been reduced to Examples, which is
> the general pattern.
> 
> 
>  
>> I'd offer to do something on this but have my work cut out 
>> trying to do a new draft of CT by next week.
> 
> 
> No need. It's done.
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 17:02:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:54 UTC