W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: 3.10 control labelling Re: New Version of BP Addendum

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:36:15 +0200
To: achuter@technosite.es
Cc: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, "Public MWBP" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u0ec2pd2wxe0ny@widsith.local>
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:55:24 +0200, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>  
wrote:

> Hi Kai, Chaals, group,
>
> There is a detailed description to this in WCAG 2.0 [1]. It seems a  
> shame to be reinventing the wheel here.

Yes, referring to that makes sense too.

> I would question the appropriateness of using HTML5 for the examples  
> while it is still a draft.

I'm not at all wedded to it being HTML5 (and I think the fragments are  
valid XHTML as well, but didn't check them). But they should be checked  
for validity against the relevant dialect before we claim they are  
whatever our preferred markup is :)

> "User-visible input element" would be more accurate as "element for user  
> input" or "input element for user interaction". Not all users see the  
> form.

Sure.

cheers

Chaals


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 10:37:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:54 UTC