- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:58:33 +0100
- To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi Francois I'd be happy with that. If we can agree it on the call this afternoon that would be great. Jo On 20/10/2009 08:55, Francois Daoust wrote: > Hi Jo, > > Given that the CT Landscape is to remain as is for a long time, I would > not anchor it in time with a mention of the Last Call Working Draft of > the guidelines. The guidelines should not stay as last call forever. I > would also clarify that by "historical" we mean the guidelines were > inspired by this document but may precisely follow this set of > requirements. Or is "historical" clear enough for everyone? I suggest > the two following changes. > > > In the abstract, I suggest to replace: > [[ In this revision the document is largely historical - the > Transformation Guidelines document having been published as a Last Call > Working Draft . ]] > > by: > [[ In this revision the document is largely historical: the Content > Transformation Guidelines document, published under the title > "Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies" [LINK to > http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/] and initially inspired by the set > of requirements identified in this document, has evolved based on > available technologies and feedback and may not precisely follow these > requirements anymore. ]] > > or by something similar in real English ;) > > > > In the Status of This document section, I would also replace: > [[ non-normative W3C Recommendation on content adaptation ]] > by: > [[ Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies ]] > and update the link to point to > http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/ > as the charter it currently points to is obsolete. > > I'll update the Status of This Document section when I prepare the > document for publication anyway to note that the we do not expect to > work on this document any further (and as required to please the > publication rules checker), so I can handle that second update unless > someone disagrees. > > > Francois. > > > Jo Rabin wrote: >> As discussed on last week's call I have made some minor edits to the >> CT Problem Statement. I've taken the liberty of preparing it for >> publication on Thursday next week in the hope that we will agree that >> on our call on Tuesday. >> >> The document is at [1] and diff from the published version is at [2]. >> >> Jo >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html >> >> >> (http://tinyurl.com/yjqphe2) >> >> >> [2] >> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ct-landscape-20071025/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html >> >> >> (http://tinyurl.com/yzww24f) >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 07:59:16 UTC