W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ACTION-1021 Tweak CT Problem Statement and Propose to Group

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:55:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4ADD6D00.4030301@w3.org>
To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi Jo,

Given that the CT Landscape is to remain as is for a long time, I would 
not anchor it in time with a mention of the Last Call Working Draft of 
the guidelines. The guidelines should not stay as last call forever. I 
would also clarify that by "historical" we mean the guidelines were 
inspired by this document but may precisely follow this set of 
requirements. Or is "historical" clear enough for everyone? I suggest 
the two following changes.

In the abstract, I suggest to replace:
[[ In this revision the document is largely historical - the 
Transformation Guidelines document having been published as a Last Call 
Working Draft . ]]

[[ In this revision the document is largely historical: the Content 
Transformation Guidelines document, published under the title 
"Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies" [LINK to 
http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/] and initially inspired by the set 
of requirements identified in this document, has evolved based on 
available technologies and feedback and may not precisely follow these 
requirements anymore. ]]

or by something similar in real English ;)

In the Status of This document section, I would also replace:
[[ non-normative W3C Recommendation on content adaptation ]]
[[ Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies ]]
and update the link to point to
as the charter it currently points to is obsolete.

I'll update the Status of This Document section when I prepare the 
document for publication anyway to note that the we do not expect to 
work on this document any further (and as required to please the 
publication rules checker), so I can handle that second update unless 
someone disagrees.


Jo Rabin wrote:
> As discussed on last week's call I have made some minor edits to the CT 
> Problem Statement. I've taken the liberty of preparing it for 
> publication on Thursday next week in the hope that we will agree that on 
> our call on Tuesday.
> The document is at [1] and diff from the published version is at [2].
> Jo
> [1] 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html 
> (http://tinyurl.com/yjqphe2)
> [2] 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ct-landscape-20071025/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html 
> (http://tinyurl.com/yzww24f)
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 07:56:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:54 UTC