W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > June 2009

Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:03:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4A3F731E.8010502@w3.org>
To: Adam Connors <adamconnors@google.com>
CC: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>, public-bpwg@w3.org
Adam Connors wrote:
> thanks. inline.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com 
> <mailto:casays@yahoo.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Status
> 
>     --------
>     This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February
>     2004 W3C Patent
>     Policy. This document is informative only.
>     --------
> 
>     To avoid confusion, perhaps the following text would be suitable:
> 
>     The present document was produced by a group operating under the 5
>     February 2004 W3C
>     Patent Policy; the latter document is informative only.
> 
>     Although, is it true that the patent policy document is informative
>     only? Is it not
>     binding upon the work of the various W3C groups?
> 
> will do.

On that particular point, don't.
This text is imposed by the publication rules. See point 12 in:
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?year=2009&uimode=filter&filter=Filter+pubrules&filterValues=form&docstatus=lc-wd-tr&patpol=w3c&rectrack=yes&normative=no&prevrec=none#docreqs


Francois.
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 12:04:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:54 UTC