W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > June 2009

Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:47:49 +0200
To: "Eduardo Casais" <casays@yahoo.com>, public-bpwg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uvxcdzoawxe0ny@esws31067.es.deloitte.com>
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:07:55 +0200, Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>  
wrote:

> Status
> --------
> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February  
> 2004 W3C Patent
> Policy. This document is informative only.
> --------
> To avoid confusion, perhaps the following text would be suitable:
> The present document was produced by a group operating under the 5  
> February 2004 W3C
> Patent Policy; the latter document is informative only.
> Although, is it true that the patent policy document is informative  
> only? Is it not
> binding upon the work of the various W3C groups?

The Patent Policy is binding on W3C Recommendations. I suggest copying the  
paragraph word for word from some recent recommendation. (I was under the  
impression that the pubrules checker will actually provide text for you if  
it doesn't match a pretty exact wording, but that may not be so).

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 11:48:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:01 UTC