W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > June 2009

FYI: Privacy Jungle: Data Protection in Social Networks

From: 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:05:05 +0900
Message-ID: <03F823891AF33D499971F7DDAB8EAD1702CD31CC@email2>
To: <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Dear all,

I found a interesting report. 

In this report, they have some tests for the mobileOK on social networking sites. 

They have verified accessibility for mobile devices using the W3C mobileOK Checker, which
checks a Web page against a defined set of recommended guidelines derived from best practices for the
mobileWeb and issues scores between 0 and 100.

I think it would be a good reference for MWBP. 

Best Regards, 

--- Jonathan Jeon

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-socialweb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-socialweb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Soren Preibusch
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:42 PM
To: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org; public-pling@w3.org
Subject: Privacy Jungle: Data Protection in Social Networks


Dear all,

We are pleased to announce the largest and most comprehensive field study in the academic literature so far of data protection on social networking sites. Our analyses include the sites' functionality, privacy controls, written privacy policies, P3P policies, and metadata for each site. The dataset and our interpretations are freely available online and will be presented at WEIS 2009 in London in two weeks time:

    Joseph Bonneau, Sören Preibusch:
    The Privacy Jungle: On the Market for Data Protection in Social Networks
    in: The Eighth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2009)
    http://preibusch.de/publ/privacy_jungle 

Abstract:
We have conducted the first thorough analysis of the market for privacy practices and policies in online social networks. From an evaluation of 45 social networking sites using 260 criteria we find that many popular assumptions regarding privacy and social networking need to be revisited when considering the entire ecosystem instead of only a handful of well-known sites. Contrary to the common perception of an oligopolistic market, we find evidence of vigorous competition for new users. Despite observing many poor security practices, there is evidence that social network providers are making efforts to implement privacy enhancing technologies with substantial diversity in the amount of privacy control offered. However, privacy is rarely used as a selling point, even then only as auxiliary, non-decisive feature. Sites also failed to promote their existing privacy controls within the site. We similarly found great diversity in the length and content of formal privacy policies, but found an opposite promotional trend: though almost all policies are not accessible to ordinary users due to obfuscating legal jargon, they conspicuously vaunt the sites' privacy practices. We conclude that the market for privacy in social networks is dysfunctional in that there is significant variation in sites' privacy controls, data collection requirements, and legal privacy policies, but this is not effectively conveyed to users. Our empirical findings motivate us to introduce the novel model of a privacy communication game, where the economically rational choice for a site operator is to make privacy control available to evade criticism from privacy fundamentalists, while hiding the privacy control interface and privacy policy to maximise sign-up numbers and encourage data sharing from the pragmatic majority of users. 

Regards,
Sören


Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 08:06:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:01 UTC