- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:09:59 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Adam Connors" <adamconnors@google.com>
- Cc: "Rotan Hanrahan" <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>, "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:45:01 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: >> Thanks. Added. > > More to the point, this calls into question the strength of "prefer > server side techniques". While it is clear that those are more powerful, > and can reduce the amount of content sent to the client, they are more > complicated and are not necessarily available ... > For the moment I will just flag the question - I am not sure how much it > is worth changing the basics we have. But I think we should look at some > kind of wordsmithing to clarify the point a bit... I tried to give examples of the type of adaption possible but they haven't made it into the draft http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/BestPractices-2.0/ED-mobile-bp2-20090619#bp-devcap-scripting How about "CSS Media Queries: Media queries allow developers to apply style rules depending on certain attributes of the device. See Media Queries [CSSMQ]. For adaptation that requires reformatting of layout, fonts, background images, colours or hiding elements from mobile devices, this may be the simplest method for the developer" or some such? bruce
Received on Sunday, 21 June 2009 08:10:55 UTC