CT guidelines: X-Device-* definition

Hi Jo,

Comments on the 7 June 2009 version related to the definition of the 
X-Device-* HTTP header fields:

1. Accept-Language is still not in the list of the "other than" in 
4.1.5. Any reason why it's not there?

2. The (unclear) resolution we took on 28 April 2009 while you were away 
and not watching has not been applied:
  [ Properly define X-Device-* HTTP headers in the Content 
Transformation guidelines using references to the appropriate sections 
of RFC2616 ]
  http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-bpwg-minutes.html#item05

The goal is to have, in 4.1.5.5, the list of new HTTP header fields 
being explicitly defined (as opposed to X-Device-<original header name>) 
with a reference to the production definition of the original field they 
replace in the HTTP RFC (or just a "refer to the HTTP RFC" global 
reference). The more precise we are with new HTTP header fields, the 
less problems we'll have to have them properly registered in the 
appropriate registry.

See my ACTION-928 email for more context:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Apr/0023.html

Thanks,
Francois.

Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 16:55:01 UTC