W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [minutes] Tuesday 13 January 2009

From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:26 +0000
Message-Id: <A192ACE6-924B-4A97-8F5D-6E04548ABD6D@futureplatforms.com>
To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>

It's really quite simple simple. You keep saying "CT always rules  
against developers". This isn't true. If it was, I'd have noticed and  
would be complaining.

I've given you a couple of very specific examples which demonstrate  
this is not the case. Let me know if you'd like some more, and I'll  
look through the minutes for you; and in the mean time, please  
consider refraining from undermining the efforts of those prepared to  
be a little more constructive than yourself.

On 14 Jan 2009, at 17:46, Luca Passani wrote:

> What do you want to prove with this? . Yes, CTG has worked around  
> the fact that WML is broken by "no-transcode" and yes this was  
> suggested by developers, but this does not mean that CTWG has  
> consistently  ruled against content owners in 99% of the cases, not  
> coincidentally you keep referring from this same thing over and over  
> again.

Future Platforms Ltd
e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com
t: +44 (0) 1273 819038
m: +44 (0) 7971 781422
company: www.futureplatforms.com
personal: tomhume.org
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 19:14:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:58 UTC