- From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:26 +0000
- To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
It's really quite simple simple. You keep saying "CT always rules against developers". This isn't true. If it was, I'd have noticed and would be complaining. I've given you a couple of very specific examples which demonstrate this is not the case. Let me know if you'd like some more, and I'll look through the minutes for you; and in the mean time, please consider refraining from undermining the efforts of those prepared to be a little more constructive than yourself. On 14 Jan 2009, at 17:46, Luca Passani wrote: > What do you want to prove with this? . Yes, CTG has worked around > the fact that WML is broken by "no-transcode" and yes this was > suggested by developers, but this does not mean that CTWG has > consistently ruled against content owners in 99% of the cases, not > coincidentally you keep referring from this same thing over and over > again. -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.org
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 19:14:06 UTC