- From: Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:37:25 +0100
- To: public-bpwg@w3.org
> Thoughts ? yes. BPWG is still being the victim of one-web. Open your minds to the concept that mobile devices are different from desktop web browsers and plain simple logic will do the rest. Luca Adam Connors wrote: > Thanks Eduardo! That's incredibly useful and thorough input. > > I have to say that I'm not in favour of having a BP to this effect in > MWABP though. My reasoning goes as follows: > > * We have a BP on "One Web" which encourages the use of the same > account / personalization between desktop and mobile web applications > --> it would be strange then to have different recommendations for > mobile passwords as opposed to desktop passwords. > > * Virtual keyboards are getting more popular and so even on mid-range > devices can we not expect the input limitations of numeric keypads to > fade away pretty quickly. > > * The type="password" tag on most devices these days hides all except > for the last character entered in order to help mobile entry -- so the > "don't hide" advice is outdated I think. > > Perhaps the take-away from this then is that we should have a BP along > these lines: > > 3.1.2 Enable Automatic Sign-in Between Invocations > > Due to the difficulties of entering sign-in information on a mobile > phone it's particularly important to enable automatic sign-in. This > can be done by storing a Hashed user identity token in a cookie. Don't > store unhashed user password information in cookies though as it's > insecure. > > (With some word-smithing, of course). > > Thoughts ? > > Adam. > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com > <mailto:casays@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > > The action is stated as "Note specific mobile good practice for > login forms > regarding use of numerics and mixed case and so on". > > > 1. GOOD PRACTICES. > > Mobile applications strive to fulfil two requirements: > > - minimize input keystrokes; > - minimize possibilities for mistaken input. > > >From these principles, the following good practices have been > derived regarding > password input in forms: > > a) Do not mix alphabetic symbols and numbers, nor upper- and > lowercase. > b) Use numeric pin-codes rather than passwords. > c) Do not mask input that is being entered by the end user. > > These practices obviously go counter to password guidelines in the > desktop Web, > where mixing all sorts of alphanumeric symbols, both upper and > lowercase, is > recommended. > > > 2. TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION. > > Technically, these practices are implemented via specific > attributes in the > input tag in markup, and in rejecting input fields of type > password in favour > of normal text fields. > > In XHTML mobile profile (format="NNNN" indicates a 4-numbers field): > <input type="text" name="pin" value="" > style="-wap-input-format:NNNN" /> > > In i-mode HTML (istyle="4" indicates a numeric field): > <input type=”password” name=”pin” maxlength=”4” size=”4” istyle=”4”> > > In WML (format="NNNN5N" indicates a numeric field with 4 to 9 > symbols): > <input type="text" name="pincode" value="" format="NNNN5N" > emptyok="false"/> > > > 3. REFERENCES. > > The following extracts are from several documents that deal > explicitly with > password input in mobile applications, and dating from 2001 to 2008. > > Addressed good practices (a, b, c) are indicated for each reference. > > ------------ > > (c) > > Luca Passani: Global Authoring Practices for the Mobile Web > v.1.0.4, 2008-11. > > > Manage User Input (use input masks/minimize clicks) > > [NO_PASSWORD_MASK] Do not mask user input when entering a password. > > Rationale: Entering data and text is a very time consuming and > error-prone > task for users of mobile devices. Everything possible should be > done to > minimize the amount of clicks required to users. > > [...] Reading what is on the screen of a mobile device is often > hard enough > for the user of the device. Peeking over the shoulder of the user > is less > likely to disclose a password than observing the user's keypress > sequence. > For this reason, hiding user input to users themselves by > replacing each > character with a '*' (star) symbol (or similar) will do very > little to protect > privacy, while making it generally harder to use the service. For > this reason, > users should be made enter passwords in clear text. > > ------------ > > (a) (c) > > Nokia: Guidelines For Creating Web Content For Mobile And PC > Browsing, v.1.0, > 2004-09-27. > > > 2.12.1 Input fields > > [...] Avoid requiring letters and numbers in the same input field > (especially > in a password field). When the password contains both numbers and > letters, > users in tests have entered the wrong password without noticing it. > > Avoid requiring case sensitivity (especially in password fields). > In password > fields, when input characters turn to asterisks, novice users may have > difficulties remembering what they have input. > > ------------ > > (a) (c) > > Sprint: Usability Requirements for XHTML Basic Applications, 2003-01. > > > 4 PASSWORD ENTRY: A SPECIAL WARNING > > The following recommendations are not requirements because we > cannot judge the > security needs of your application. We set this recommendation > aside to stress > its importance to usability. We urge you to consider it carefully. > > ! Do not mask out text input with “password” formatting. The > usability problems > associated with triple-tapping masked passwords outweigh the costs > of hiding > those passwords. Here’s why… > > On the surface, password format appears usable because the user > can see each > character as it is entered. Actually, while typing letters, users > look at the > keypad — not the display - as they determine the triple-tap > sequence for each > character. Once they look up at the display, the cursor will have > advanced, > obscuring the just-entered character with an asterisk or similar > character. > Even the most experienced users will have occasional trouble with > password > format. We do. Consider that each mobile device is a personal > device, and its > user has considerable control over it. Unlike kiosk or fixed computer > situations, where somebody could look over a user’s shoulder, in > mobile > situations the user can move the screen and keypad wherever > desired. When > combined with the difficulty in text entry on most devices and the > likelihood > of user distraction partway through text input, masking user input > has an > unacceptably high user cost for very low user or security benefit. > > As a developer, do not be swayed by your personal ability to > flawlessly > triple-tap a 14-character, mixed-case, alphanumeric password. You > are more > capable than your users! Most of them will fail at this task and > not return > to your application unless they must. > > In summary: masking passwords (during input) will reduce the amount of > password theft primarily because there will be fewer passwords to > steal, > because there will be fewer users. > > ! Avoid unnecessarily complex password formats. The format of your > password has > a strong and direct effect on the difficulty of entry. In general, the > difficulty of entering a masked string increases with the > complexity of the > string. As a rule: > -- Alphanumeric strings are more difficult to enter than alphabetic, > -- Alphabetic strings are more difficult to enter than numeric, > -- Case-sensitive strings are more difficult to enter than > case-insensitive, > -- Strings with symbols are more difficult to enter than strings > without > symbols, etc. > > Because complex passwords are more secure passwords, you must find the > appropriate balance for your particular application. All-numeric > strings > are the easiest to enter, but because it is not possible to force > numeric > format with some PCS Vision phones, we recommend that you not mask > out numeric > passwords. > > ! If you do not mask text input with “password” formatting, assign > the password > input field to its own page. A password alone is useless. A > password combined > with a user ID or other credentials is a different matter. If you > choose to > increase the usability of your application by not masking > passwords, you can > avoid any additional risks by not displaying a user’s full set of > credentials > on one page. > > ------------ > > (b) > > How to create an i-mode site, 2002-11-18. > > > INPUT Tag > > [...] Text input fields can have an istyle attribute that > indicates the input > mode for the field. > [...] For password fields: > <input type=”password” name=”name” accesskey=”accesskey” > maxlength=”maxlength” > size=”size” value=”value”> > The default istyle attribute value for password inputs is numeric > (4) and > cannot be changed, except for the NEC N21i and TS21i. For these > handsets > you should force the style to numeric. > [...] Tip: Limit password inputs to numeric only and indicate that > a PIN code > is required, rather than a password. > > ------------ > > (b) > > ATT: Guide to mMode-Compliant HTML Coding, v.1.0, 2002-05-14. > > > 2.2.2.6. Forms (User Entry) > 2.2.2.6.1. Text Entry > > [...] Note: istyle is not supported for input element with type > equal to > password, which is always set to numeric input. > > ------------ > > (b) (c) > > Openwave: GSM Application Style Guide, 2001-02. > > > Section 9: Data Entry Queries > > [...] Make password fields numeric only, when possible. > It is easier to enter numbers than letters or symbols. > > Do not mask alphanumeric passwords. > Do not mask the entry. It is easier for the user to hide the display > from others than to type with masked characters. > > ------------ > > > E.Casais > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 09:38:04 UTC