W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > September 2008

RE: Issues cleansing

From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:37:15 +0200
Message-ID: <398533C370C23441981074C456AA3BDD031DBB03@QEO00226.de.t-online.corp>
To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "public-bpwg" <public-bpwg@w3.org>

I agree with you, Dom.

As far as I am concerned we can close these.

-- Kai


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique 
> Hazael-Massieux
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:20 AM
> To: public-bpwg
> Subject: Issues cleansing
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've looked to our current list of open issues [1], and I 
> suggest the following issues could be marked as closed 
> without much loss: 
>  * ISSUE-134 about the test for color contrast - the current 
> BP Addendum refers to the WCAG 2 test, which I think takes 
> into account the various points raised in the issue (which 
> was also mostly meant in a machine-testable contact for 
> mobileOK Basic, and is more or less void given it didn't make 
> into there)
>  * ISSUE-185 about the deliverables for "mobileOK Full" 
> should be closed since we clarified that the deliverables for 
> mobileOK Full are now really the addendum to bp 1
>  * ISSUE-236 on creating a DDC-emulator seems moot now
>  * ISSUE-189 about more than numeric access keys in mobileOK 
> - given that mobileOK Basic doesn't have test on accesskeys, 
> and that the addendum doesn't put any restriction on the type 
> of accesskeys that can be used, I think that one is moot.
> 
> I'm not clear whether ISSUE-254 on the revision of the DDC to 
> include PNG is still relevant or not - it doesn't look like 
> something that could be done in mobileOK at this stage (and 
> we specifically resolved not to do so IIRC), and I don't see 
> how it could fit in the addendum either. If that's so, the 
> issue should be closed.
> 
> Dom
> 
> 1. http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/open
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 11:37:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:57 UTC