On 11/09/2008 12:37, Manrique Lopez wrote: > Comments below > > Best regards, > > El jue, 11-09-2008 a las 12:07 +0100, Jo Rabin escribió: >>> - If a page passes "mobileOK Basic 1.0 Tests", is it a "mobileOK" page? >> Yes >> > > That's what I already know because it was discussed in Sophia's F2F. > What I am afraid of is about people making "mobileOK" pages/URI reading > only what the checker reports (nothing more, nothing less). Yes. I agree. We've all been concerned about this - but as I mentioned, I think, my view is that *just* getting people to be mobileOK is a step on the right road. > >>> - What do I need to do to get "mobileOK" logo in my page? >> This should be discussed in the document mobileOK Scheme, coming your >> way real soon now. >> > > Yes, it will be interesting. > >Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 11:40:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:52 UTC