Re: ACTION-837 - Provide explanatory text for the addendum... ISSUE-272 a new name ISSUE-273 for which document? ISSUE-274 which texts are needed?

On 11/09/2008 12:37, Manrique Lopez wrote:
> Comments below
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> El jue, 11-09-2008 a las 12:07 +0100, Jo Rabin escribió:
>>> - If a page passes "mobileOK Basic 1.0 Tests", is it a "mobileOK" page?
>> Yes
>>
> 
> That's what I already know because it was discussed in Sophia's F2F.
> What I am afraid of is about people making "mobileOK" pages/URI reading
> only what the checker reports (nothing more, nothing less).

Yes. I agree. We've all been concerned about this - but as I mentioned, 
I think, my view is that *just* getting people to be mobileOK is a step 
on the right road.

> 
>>> - What do I need to do to get "mobileOK" logo in my page?
>> This should be discussed in the document mobileOK Scheme, coming your 
>> way real soon now.
>>
> 
> Yes, it will be interesting.
> 
>