W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: ACTION-837 - Provide explanatory text for the addendum... ISSUE-272 a new name ISSUE-273 for which document? ISSUE-274 which texts are needed?

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:39:40 +0100
Message-ID: <48C9037C.40109@mtld.mobi>
To: manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org
CC: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, public-bpwg@w3.org



On 11/09/2008 12:37, Manrique Lopez wrote:
> Comments below
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> El jue, 11-09-2008 a las 12:07 +0100, Jo Rabin escribió:
>>> - If a page passes "mobileOK Basic 1.0 Tests", is it a "mobileOK" page?
>> Yes
>>
> 
> That's what I already know because it was discussed in Sophia's F2F.
> What I am afraid of is about people making "mobileOK" pages/URI reading
> only what the checker reports (nothing more, nothing less).

Yes. I agree. We've all been concerned about this - but as I mentioned, 
I think, my view is that *just* getting people to be mobileOK is a step 
on the right road.

> 
>>> - What do I need to do to get "mobileOK" logo in my page?
>> This should be discussed in the document mobileOK Scheme, coming your 
>> way real soon now.
>>
> 
> Yes, it will be interesting.
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 11:40:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:57 UTC