- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:54:20 +0200
- To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Per ACTION-748, I was to check what we're to do about conformance with BP2 if we don't plan to have any mobileOK equivalent that applies to these new best practices. As mentioned in last call for other reasons, BP1 and BP2 are informative recommendations-to-be. You can't claim conformance to BP1. What you can do for BP1 is to claim conformance to the normative mobileOK Basic Tests document that was based on some of the best practices of BP1. The conformance section that appears in BP1 only links to the mobileOK trustmark. The same goes with BP2. If we do not plan to work on such a normative side-document for BP2, the equivalent "conformance" section for BP2 is rather useless, a mere: "watch out, there could be a normative doc out there that uses the best practices defined here!". It is, at least, not compulsory to have such a section in an informative doc.
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 15:54:56 UTC