- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:15:44 -0000
- To: "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, "Public MWBP" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi Phil Thanks for the gentle reminder of the need for action. ISSUE-238 and ACTION-703 both have a direct relevance to this, and both are essentially down to me to chase. I hadn't forgotten our call, or either of these actions, it's just that I have been running around like a headless chicken since the Seoul F2F and have only just managed to get my head back above water (if that is not too grotesque a mixed metaphor). There will definitely be input from BP on this, but there are definitely only 24 hours in each day. Jo --- Jo Rabin mTLD (http://dotmobi.mobi) mTLD Top Level Domain Limited is a private limited company incorporated and registered in the Republic of Ireland with registered number 398040 and registered office at Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Phil Archer > Sent: 17 March 2008 09:53 > To: Public MWBP > Subject: HTTP Link Use cases > > > Jo and I discussed this on the phone the other day so this note is > > a) to remind him of that conversation; > b) alert other members of the group to the issue. > > We have discussed the potential usefulness of the HTTP Link Header in > the mobile space in past meetings (I recall doing so most recently at > TPAC last year). The issue continues to surface and resurface on the > IETF/W3C HTTP group and has lead to some very recent and extensive > discussion. Happy Halpin kicked things off this time [1] and this lead > to mark Nottingham breathing new life into his draft [2]. I chimed in > with the POWDER use case [3]. In between these are messages from the > likes of Roy Fielding and Julian Reschke. > > The bulk of the discussion centred on the need for/best approach to > providing an HTTP Profile header, i.e. an extensible and unambiguous way > to extend relationship types. It's not as easy as it sounds... > > If the MWBP in general, and the CTTF in particular, wishes to support > the reinstatement of HTTP Link and comment on the wider discussion. NOW > is the time when such an input can have most effect. > > Cheers > > Phil. > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0444.html > [2] http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0499.html
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 11:16:35 UTC