- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:59:49 -0000
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>
- Cc: "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Some morphic resonance at work in Dom and my simultaneous replies ... I agree with Dom that specifying this accurately is a reasonable amount of work (e.g. are level 2 and 3 rules extraneous?). Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org] > Sent: 18 January 2008 07:42 > To: Sean Owen > Cc: Jo Rabin; Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG > Subject: Re: ISSUE-231: MINIMIZE should take into account whitespace in > CSS[mobileOK Basic tests] > > > Le vendredi 18 janvier 2008 à 00:43 -0500, Sean Owen a écrit : > > @media screen stylesheets would not, in theory, get downloaded, so I > > don't think it would be counted as overhead? > > I think Jo was thinking to a single style sheet which would contain: > @media screen { > [100k worth of screen-only rules] > } > > @media handheld { > [1 rule] > } > > I agree with the assessment that this should be counted as overhead (the > same way with count comments in HTML markup). > > But I think we shouldn't integrate CSS into MINIMIZE at this stage in > the process; I'm fairly sure there would be quite a few details to iron > out, and this would delay the release of the spec. > > (I think our current suggestion that this be indicated as an information > by tools that wish to do so is a good one - that we'll probably > implement the W3C checker; and it will always be time to do a mobileok > 1.1 where you can fail because of this if we think this is really > important) > > Dom
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 13:00:17 UTC