Re: MobileOK Tests, Basic and Pro

For what it is worth I also agree with Alan's interpretation here.

On Feb 11, 2008 7:21 AM, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es> wrote:
> I think that we should be clear from the outset whether this is about
> black box or white box testing. I had assumed it would be black box
> and that we simply require evaluation of what is produced. I don't
> think it's practical to expect that developers even have a formal
> development process and test records, which are not required by the
> BPs. Even if records are available, who can vouch for their veracity?
> There have been calls for process to be included in the evaluation
> process and there is a label here in Spain that includes it. But
> generally certification rests on the product as it is delivered. In an
> ideal world I would be in favour of auditing the development process
> but in practice I also am not in favour of it.

Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 16:13:12 UTC