Thanks for taking my comments into account! Jo Rabin wrote: [removing the awesome part] > [Note that the current document describes a different signifier. > Information that has come to light since last call suggests that it's > likely that it will be changed to the above in the next draft] One could wonder what the light revealed. I'd even link to RFC 3986 section 4.4, here, for the sake of clarity. Thanks! Francois.Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 18:23:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:52 UTC