W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Latest thoughts about ISSUE-240 (DTD Validation)

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:31:14 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0804180431p1be5fb93o8fc7ba1c9219ae27@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org

I personally am also OK with something like what is proposed by Jo. I
suggest the list for our version 1.0 be fixed at:

XHTML MP 1.0 - 1.2
XHTML Basic 1.0 - 1.1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
>  If the above looks more-or-less OK then the question is what is the list of "known" DOCTYPEs and how can the spec be made future proof against further versions of xhtml? (That's the good thing about standards, there are so many of them to choose from)
Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 11:31:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:51 UTC