W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: BP2 Comments

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:34:10 +0200
Message-ID: <79cab0900804010734y3cbad359lf6404a641c7628e4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>

I haven't read this in detail like I should have, but I can see how
important it is from the new BPs. However, reading the introduction it
wasn't clear to me how it relates to BP1 (what does "in the footsteps"
mean?) in terms of what people are supposed to do. I would imagine
that they should do BP1 first and then move on to this cumulatively,
but the document doesn't seem to say that.

I think there is a need to update BP1 together with the writing of BP2
and to link the two together.

The conformance section says "intended to be capable of having
conformance statements constructed around them...", but many of them
are not black-box testable. It would be a good idea to flag these now
to avoid confusion.

regards,

-- 
Alan Chuter,
Senior Web Accessibility Consultant, Technosite (www.technosite.es)
Researcher, Inredis Project (www.inredis.es/)
Email: achuter@technosite.es
Alternative email: achuter.technosite@yahoo.com
Blogs: www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 14:34:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:58 UTC