[minutes] Thu 29 November teleconf

Hi,

The minutes of the (shortened) call of the BPWG teleconf held today are
available at:
http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-bpwg-minutes.html

and copied as text below.

Dom

[1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

        Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference

29 Nov 2007

   [2]Agenda

      [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2007Nov/0008.html

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-bpwg-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Dom, kemp, miguel, jo, Magnus, abel, Shahriar, rob,
          Ed_Mitukiewicz, SeanP, drooks, chaals

   Regrets
          Bruno, PhilA, Adam, DanA, Bryan, Nacho, bindu_rao

   Chair
          Jo

   Scribe
          Aaron Kemp

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]Good standing
         2. [6]CT Task force
         3. [7]checker TF
         4. [8]mobileOK Pro poll
         5. [9]Accessility doc
         6. [10]republication of mobileOK CR
     * [11]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________

Good standing

   jo: first off, good standing... for this charter, we'll be more
   strict about maintaining records on good standing... wanted to make
   sure everyone was aware of that...
   ... things like, if you are a member of the group, you need to
   answer to the surveys, come to teleconferences, etc... in the last
   charter, we ended up with lots of regrets all the time
   ... any comments about that?

   Magnus: i was a bit surprising to see how many were in bad standing
   in the group... curious about how they got bad standing?

   <dom> [12]Current view of the group

     [12] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=37584

   jo: i think it was the crossover from the old charter to the new
   charter

   dom: not quite sure where the bad standing stats come from... i
   think we should reset the flags and wait for us to define rules.
   i'll clean up the list

   jo: anything else on good standing?

CT Task force

   <dom> [everybody is back in good standing for the time being]

   jo: reports from taskforces... from the content transformation
   group: we're still looking for a leader of the group... a new draft
   of the document should appear shortly (today/tomorrow)

   <jo> [13]CT Draft

     [13] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/latest

checker TF

   jo: on to checker... sean is not here, so very briefly: a number of
   bugs have been worked through, work continuing... target of january
   for beta release

mobileOK Pro poll

   <jo> [14]Poll

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/MobileOK-Pro/

   <dom> [15]results

     [15] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/MobileOK-Pro/results

   jo: according to the mobile OK pro poll, the answer is a fairly
   solid "yes"... since kai and archer are not on the call, there's not
   much we can say except that assuming we can find someone to act as
   leader, it looks like it is going ahead
   ... let's put it on hold until the next time kai is on the call to
   see if he wants to lead the TF
   ... has anyone had a chance to look at the accessibility document?

Accessility doc

   <jo> [16]Document

     [16] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/latest

   chaals: yes, i've sent some more comments, and think that it is
   moving ahead steadily

   <dom> [17]Current latest version, dated Nov 25

     [17] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20071125

   jo: my comment is that i'm not quite sure whether the target of the
   document is clearly focused. it seems to be that it could be about a
   number of things and right now it's about a mixture of those things

   chaals: i have a similar concern, i think it needs to be clearer
   about who it's for. i think there are some things being fixed up
   that will help, but i think there is work to do.
   ... i think it's a big chunk of work, but don't think there is need
   for concern about the timeline, we raise issues and move forward

   jo: ok anything else? not sure where Alan is...
   ... ok, any other business?

republication of mobileOK CR

   dom: i found a small but annoying bug in the mobile OK spec:
   useragent string defined by the spec is not the one we had decided
   on a few months ago.
   ... given that websites are likely to fairly strictly match against
   the string, while the error is minor, it is a fairly serious bug. so
   we are going to publish a new version tomorrow with a fix

   jo: ok thanks dom, so everyone make sure you are using the right
   string

Summary of Action Items

   [End of minutes]

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 15:33:48 UTC