- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:00:16 -0400
- To: "Herwig Feichtinger" <hf@isdn-capi.de>
- Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org
Keep in mind this was an early implementation from Dom and is not necessarily up-to-date with respect to the test spec, or may have some bugs. For example the test spec allows for XHTML MP now. I'm not sure about the text/plain issue. You might also look at http://ready.mobi and http://validadores.tawdis.net/mobileok for other mostly-up-to-date implementations mobileOK Basic. A reference implementation is forthcoming. Sean On 6/8/07, Herwig Feichtinger <hf@isdn-capi.de> wrote: > > Hello, > I have just changed the <h2> to <h1>. The corresponding > heading error is gone, but a new one came up: > > "The page has text/plain as a media type; that media type is not > supported by Default Delivery Context." > > That's funny since the content-type header line delivered by > the HTTP server for www.shamrock.de/pda is: > Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=iso-8859-1 > So what's wrong with this one? Or is it a temporary glitch > in the validator? > > The other "problem" (DOCTYPE = XHTML MP instead of XHTML Basic 1.0) > is by intention. Look at www.google.com/pda or other sites > for a mobile audience, they also result in this validation error. > > Herwig > > "Sergiu Dumitriu" <sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com> wrote: > >The page isn't valid with respect to the XHTML Basic profile. [...] > >The second error is not about the img tag, but about the fact that > >there is no <h1> element. [...] > >
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 17:00:37 UTC