- From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:16:25 +0100
- To: <public-bpwg-pro@w3.org>
> In fairness to Paul, he didn't actually agree to it - he > wasn't in the room at the time. We just gave him the action > item, partly tongue in cheek. Yes we did, but then I actually did ask Paul directly, once present, and he did agree. I wouldn't just toss that into somebody's lap. > As I understand it though, we do need to have some sort of > reference framework in which tests can be carried out, and > maybe some functionality to pretend to be something else > (like a more feature-rich client). I would suggest that a Web > interface would be the most useful. So really it needs > _someone_ to take ownership of this and to develop it, > preferably as we go along (this might help us to define some > of the more woollyy tests?). > > We suggested Paul as he has some development capability > within Segala and is in a better position to direct resources > there than others might be. > Yes, of course, Deutsche Telekom has more resources - but it > also has many more hoops to jump through and it's probably > impractical for them to take this on. Dave already asked for the code, which I simply didn't want to send to the public list, but will transfer to him. -- Kai
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 08:16:38 UTC